Question:
MQB – solder-less adapters,
Xhorse KTP vs. ACDP
Who used both?
What are pro’s and con’s?
Does one of these tools work better for MQB?
Here is the Comparison Chart:
| Xhorse MQB48 Adapter Set | Yanhua MQB Module 33& 34 | |
| Support List | D70F3524(A2C00889000) D70F3525(A2C81589600) D70F3525(A2C81589600) D70F3526(A2C81589700) D70F3529 D70F3532(A2C81589500) D70F3535(A2C81589200) D70F3536 D70F3537(A2C81589800) | Module 33 D70F3524, 3525, 3526, 3529, 3532, 3533, 3536, 3537, and 8pin chip 95320 Module 34 D70F3423/3426 R7F71401/ 1402/ 1407 |
| Function | 1)Add Key & All Key Lost (RH850 Cable is required for R7F701401/ R7F701402/ R7F701404/ R7F701407) 2)Odometer Correction (For MQB48 odometer, use VVDI2; For RH850 Series, use Key Tool Plus) *Check out specific instructions in Multi Prog Software | Module 33 VW the 4th/4.5th generation and MQB 5A etc. IMMO and odometer correction Module 34 1)D70F3423/3426 chip mask IMMO4 cluster Add keys & all key lost & odometer correction 2)R7F71401/ 1402/ 1407 chip mask RH850 5Aodometer Add keys & all key lost & odometer correct 3)R7F71401/ 1402/ 1404/ 1406/ 1407 chip mask RH850 5C odometer correct |
Summary:
1)Xhorse supports more clusters, and Xhorse MQB Solder-free adapters are cheaper but users need at least one tool like Key Tool Plus and adapters& cables before they enjoy the full MQB function
2)ACDP MQB Modules cost more, but MINI ACDP Host is the only tool needed to work with those adapters, and it is easier to obtain immo data and correct odometer in ACDP software
Customers voices:
1)Ktp adapters are good on These acdp Is More expensive. Ktp supports More Clusters
2)I’ve got both I like acdp better, far more stable.
3)Get both. When one does not work the other one will
Done! Hope this helps!
Skype: cardiag.co.uk
WhatsApp: https://wa.me/8615002705698